'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]'
------------------------------
Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem:    innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
  Rules:
    {  d(x) -> e(u(x))
     , d(u(x)) -> c(x)
     , c(u(x)) -> b(x)
     , v(e(x)) -> x
     , b(u(x)) -> a(e(x))}

Details:         
  We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs:
   {  d^#(x) -> c_0()
    , d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))
    , c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))
    , v^#(e(x)) -> c_3()
    , b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()}
  
  The usable rules are:
   {}
  
  The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges:
   {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
     ==> {c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))}
   {c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))}
     ==> {b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()}
  
  We consider the following path(s):
   1) {  d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))
       , c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))}
      
      The usable rules for this path are empty.
      
        We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
          Interpretation Functions:
           d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           d^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_0() = [0]
           c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_3() = [0]
           c_4() = [0]
        
        We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
        
          'Weight Gap Principle'
          ----------------------
          Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
          Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
            Strict Rules: {c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))}
            Weak Rules: {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
          
          Details:         
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  u(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_0() = [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_3() = [0]
                  c_4() = [0]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            'Empty TRS'
            -----------
            Answer:           YES(?,O(1))
            Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
              Strict Rules: {}
              Weak Rules:
                {  c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))
                 , d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            
            Details:         
              The given problem does not contain any strict rules
      
   2) {  d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))
       , c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))
       , b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()}
      
      The usable rules for this path are empty.
      
        We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
          Interpretation Functions:
           d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           d^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_0() = [0]
           c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_3() = [0]
           c_4() = [0]
        
        We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
        
          'Weight Gap Principle'
          ----------------------
          Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
          Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
            Strict Rules: {b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()}
            Weak Rules:
              {  c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))
               , d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
          
          Details:         
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {  c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))
             , d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  u(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_0() = [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_3() = [0]
                  c_4() = [0]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            'Empty TRS'
            -----------
            Answer:           YES(?,O(1))
            Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
              Strict Rules: {}
              Weak Rules:
                {  b^#(u(x)) -> c_4()
                 , c^#(u(x)) -> c_2(b^#(x))
                 , d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            
            Details:         
              The given problem does not contain any strict rules
      
   3) {v^#(e(x)) -> c_3()}
      
      The usable rules for this path are empty.
      
        We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
          Interpretation Functions:
           d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           d^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_0() = [0]
           c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_3() = [0]
           c_4() = [0]
        
        We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
        
          'Weight Gap Principle'
          ----------------------
          Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
          Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
            Strict Rules: {v^#(e(x)) -> c_3()}
            Weak Rules: {}
          
          Details:         
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {v^#(e(x)) -> c_3()}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {v^#(e(x)) -> c_3()}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  e(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  d^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_0() = [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_3() = [0]
                  c_4() = [0]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            'Empty TRS'
            -----------
            Answer:           YES(?,O(1))
            Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
              Strict Rules: {}
              Weak Rules: {v^#(e(x)) -> c_3()}
            
            Details:         
              The given problem does not contain any strict rules
      
   4) {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
      
      The usable rules for this path are empty.
      
        We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
          Interpretation Functions:
           d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           d^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_0() = [0]
           c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_3() = [0]
           c_4() = [0]
        
        We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
        
          'Weight Gap Principle'
          ----------------------
          Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
          Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
            Strict Rules: {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            Weak Rules: {}
          
          Details:         
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  u(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_0() = [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_3() = [0]
                  c_4() = [0]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            'Empty TRS'
            -----------
            Answer:           YES(?,O(1))
            Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
              Strict Rules: {}
              Weak Rules: {d^#(u(x)) -> c_1(c^#(x))}
            
            Details:         
              The given problem does not contain any strict rules
      
   5) {d^#(x) -> c_0()}
      
      The usable rules for this path are empty.
      
        We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
          Interpretation Functions:
           d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           d^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_0() = [0]
           c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
           c_3() = [0]
           c_4() = [0]
        
        We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
        
          'Weight Gap Principle'
          ----------------------
          Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
          Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
            Strict Rules: {d^#(x) -> c_0()}
            Weak Rules: {}
          
          Details:         
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {d^#(x) -> c_0()}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {d^#(x) -> c_0()}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  d(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  e(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  u(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [4]
                  c_0() = [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  v^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
                  c_3() = [0]
                  c_4() = [0]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            'Empty TRS'
            -----------
            Answer:           YES(?,O(1))
            Input Problem:    innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
              Strict Rules: {}
              Weak Rules: {d^#(x) -> c_0()}
            
            Details:         
              The given problem does not contain any strict rules